Merchants/Offers vary. Arizona tax rate gambling winnings gambling idioms expressions Generally a person's employer withholds taxes from each paycheck. If Arizona state income taxes were withheld from the winnings. Continuous arizona state gambling tax innovation is inherent in Playtech's spirit, which is achieved when providing first-class gaming products and services. You should take into consideration the assortment of games provided, the arizona state gambling tax success of the site, and the fees and requirements when you are looking for the greatest web poker site.
December 11, 2008 | 2008-R-0673 | |
STATE INCOME TAX ON NONRESIDENTS' GAMBLING WINNINGS | ||
By: Judith Lohman, Chief Analyst | ||
You asked (1) whether legislation has been proposed recently to impose the state income tax on nonresidents' gambling winnings at Connecticut casinos; (2) if so, which legislators proposed the bills; and (3) whether other states with casinos impose their income taxes on nonresidents' gambling winnings.
SUMMARY
Under current law, nonresidents who have gambling winnings from Connecticut are subject to Connecticut income tax on those winnings only if they win the money in Connecticut's state-run lottery. Nonresidents' casino and pari-mutual winnings are not subject to the state income tax.
Bills to subject nonresidents' Connecticut casino winnings to the state income tax were proposed in 2005, 2007, and 2008. All three were sponsored by Rep. Shawn Johnston. All were referred to the Finance, Revenue and Bonding Committee, which did not act on them. In 2002, the General Assembly passed a law to impose Connecticut income tax on nonresidents' casino winnings over $5,000, but it repealed the provision a short time later before it could take effect. The 2002 laws were included in large emergency certified budget implementing bills.
A computer survey of 16 selected states with both state income taxes and casino or pari-mutuel gambling found that 15 impose state income taxes on nonresidents' winnings in those states. Of the states surveyed, only New York follows Connecticut's example in excluding nonresident casino and pari-mutuel winnings from its state income tax.
CONNECTICUT INCOME TAX TREATMENT OF NONRESIDENTS' GAMBLING WINNINGS
People who are not Connecticut residents do not have to pay Connecticut income taxes on non-lottery gambling winnings in the state. By law, nonresidents owe Connecticut income tax only on Connecticut state lottery winnings exceeding $5,000. Winnings from all other types of gambling in the state are tax-exempt for nonresidents, including winnings from casino games, slot machines, pari-mutuel wagering, raffles, or other types of gambling occurring in Connecticut (CGS § 12-711 (b)). By law, such winnings are not considered to be derived from Connecticut sources for purposes of imposing the state income tax on those who do not live here (Department of Revenue Services, Informational Publication, IP 2005 (15), issued 10/20/05).
RECENT LEGISLATION ON NONRESIDENTS' CASINO WINNINGS
The distinction between nonresidents' Connecticut income tax liability for Connecticut lottery winnings and other types of gambling income has existed since 2001. PA 01-6, June Special Session, imposed the Connecticut income tax on a nonresident's winnings of more than $5,000 in a lottery run by the Connecticut Lottery Corporation. The change took effect on July 1, 2001 and applied to tax years beginning on or after January 1, 2001. Until that time, nonresidents were not subject to Connecticut's income tax on any Connecticut gambling winnings. The 2001 change was passed as part of a large emergency certified bill that included many tax changes.
In the May 9 Special Session in 2002, the General Assembly at first extended the income tax to also cover nonresidents' winnings over $5,000 from all other gambling activities that take place within Connecticut's borders, including at casinos on Indian reservations within the state (PA 02-1, May 9 Special Session, § 81). It changed its mind a short time later and passed another act to repeal the extension (PA 02-4, May 9 Special Session, § 17). Both sections were included in emergency certified bills implementing the state budget.
Since 2002, three proposed bills have been introduced to extend the income tax to the casino winnings of nonresidents. All were introduced by Representative Shawn Johnston of the 51st district. The bills were:
● HB 5949 (2005 Session) - An Act Concerning Taxation Of Out-Of-State Residents' Casino Winnings (co-sponsor: Rep. Nafis, 27th district)
● HB 6238 (2007 Session) - An Act Concerning Taxation Of Out-Of-State Residents' Casino Winnings
● HB 5408 (2008 Session) - An Act Concerning Taxation Of Out-Of-State Residents' Casino Winnings
All three bills were referred to the Finance, Revenue and Bonding Committee, which took no action on them.
OTHER STATES
A computer survey of income tax provisions of 16 selected states shows that 15 impose state income tax on nonresidents' non-lottery gambling winnings from within their states (see Table 1). According to the American Gaming Association's (AGA) 2008 Survey of Casino Entertainment, 13 of these states have casino gambling at commercial or racetrack casinos, Indian tribal casinos, or in the form of video lottery terminals. The other three states have noncasino forms of pari-mutuel wagering, such as horseracing. The only state in our survey that does not tax nonresidents' winnings from these forms of gambling is New York. The remaining states tax winnings, although some require winnings to exceed a certain threshold or allow nonresidents to offset winnings with losses.
The state with the highest number of casinos according to the AGA survey is Nevada, which is not included because it has no state income tax.
Table 1: State Income Tax on Nonresidents' Non-Lottery Gambling Winnings
State | Number of Casinos* | Casino Types* | Other Non-Lottery Gambling* | State Income Tax on Nonresident Winnings from Casinos or Other Non-Lottery Gambling+ |
Arizona | 25 | Tribal | Pari-mutuel | Yes. Winnings subject to state withholding at 20% of federal withholding. Losses are deductible from winnings. |
Connecticut | 2 | Tribal | Pari-mutuel | No |
Iowa | 20 | Commercial Racetrack Tribal | Pari-mutuel | Yes, if winnings are greater than $1,000 and gross income is greater than $9,000 if single and $13,500 if married filing jointly. |
Louisiana | 25 | Commercial Racetrack Tribal | Pari-mutuel | Yes |
Maryland | 0 | NA | Pari-mutuel | Yes, if the amount is greater than $500. Maryland withholding tax applies to winnings that are greater than $5,000. State withholding on nonresident winnings is 6.75%. Losses are not deductible from winnings. |
Massachusetts | 0 | NA | Pari-mutuel | Yes. Losses are not deductible from winnings. |
Michigan | 22 | Commercial Tribal | Pari-mutuel | Yes |
Minnesota | 35 | Tribal Card room | Pari-mutuel | Yes. Losses are deductible from winnings. |
Mississippi | 31 | Commercial Tribal | None | Yes. A nonrefundable 3% tax is withheld from all nonresidents' winnings required to be reported to the IRS. |
New Jersey | 11 | Commercial | Pari-mutuel | Yes. New Jersey losses are deductible from New Jersey winnings. |
New Mexico | 26 | Racetrack Tribal | Pari-mutuel | Yes. Winnings are subject to state withholding equal to 6% of federal withholding. Losses are deductible from winnings. |
New York | 16 | Racetrack (video lottery terminals) Tribal | Pari-mutuel | No |
North Dakota | 6 | Tribal | Pari-mutuel | Yes |
Pennsylvania | 11 | Commercial Racetrack | Pari-mutuel | Yes |
Rhode Island | 2 | Racetrack (video lottery terminals) | Pari-mutuel | Yes |
Virginia | 0 | NA | Pari-mutuel | Yes, if the wager is placed or paid from a Virginia location. |
Wisconsin | 28 | Tribal | Pari-mutuel | Yes. Expressly includes winnings from a casino or bingo hall located in Wisconsin and operated by a Native American tribe or band. |
* Source: American Gaming Association
+ Source: State tax department websites
State Tax On Gambling Winnings
JL:ts